GT tacho / rev counter -- how accurate are they?

H2RICK · Post by **H2RICK** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:33 am

however imagine if you put on two Sigmas for dual reference, youd lose even more top speed.

True, Allan, but ONLY if you own a Kwakker. THEIR stock speedos are notoriously inaccurate.....whereas Suzi speedos, as we all know, consistently UNDER-READ. This makes Suzis MUCH faster in actuality.

ja-moo · Post by **ja-moo** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:20 am

H2RICK wrote:
however imagine if you put on two Sigmas for dual reference, youd lose even more top speed.
True, Allan, but ONLY if you own a Kwakker. THEIR stock speedos are notoriously inaccurate.....whereas Suzi speedos, as we all know, consistently UNDER-READ. This makes Suzis MUCH faster in actuality.

That's true! It a lot easier to get a under read "sweep" when the speedos only go to 45mph. And then the Kwakers at 4 times the speed gets a over read.....

rngdng · Post by **rngdng** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:59 pm

ja-moo wrote:
H2RICK wrote:
however imagine if you put on two Sigmas for dual reference, youd lose even more top speed.
True, Allan, but ONLY if you own a Kwakker. THEIR stock speedos are notoriously inaccurate.....whereas Suzi speedos, as we all know, consistently UNDER-READ. This makes Suzis MUCH faster in actuality.
That's true! It a lot easier to get a under read "sweep" when the speedos only go to 45mph. And then the Kwakers at 4 times the speed gets a over read.....

LOL! C'mon John, you know they're not that bad. I have found Suzi speedos to be about 10% high (at worst)(mine are all optimistic). I don't think Kawakas are any worse.

Lane