I will shortly begin re-assembling the engine for my '72 J. The cylinder block has been vapor blasted and bored to 0.5mm oversize. The cylinder head has been given the lightest possible skim to address a 3 mil warp, and crankshaft rebuilt with new seals.
My questions:
What is recommended practice for when refitting a skimmed head. The 'skim' on my cylinder head was to fix a 3 mil warp and the skimming process probably removed about 5-8 mils of material. I'm not interested in improving performance and would like longevity and reliable operation. So, i don't need any extra compression. To make up for the lost head material, what are fellows thoughts on using two head gaskets?
The skimmed head has a smooth mirror finished surface that should not be a problem for gasket sealing. But the cylinder barrel isn't so pristine (see the photo below). Is it recommended to use a jointing compound on this less-than-pristine cylinder barrel such as Wellseal? Or, one of the Permatex products?
Olaf
Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket sealer?
Moderators: oldjapanesebikes, H2RICK, diamondj, Suzsmokeyallan
- Olafskii
- On the street
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:15 pm
- Country: Canada
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: 72 GT750, 74 GT750, 75 T500, 76T500, 09 DR650
- Location: Northern British Columbia
Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket sealer?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- joolstacho
- To the on ramp
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 7:55 pm
- Country: Australia
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: AS50, GS500, GT500, ex GSXR750 slabbie
- Location: Greendale Vic, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
5-8mm removed? Mils? Well I'd say you're going to need one mother of a cylinder packer! (Perhaps you mean 'thous')
?
?
- jabcb
- Moto GP
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:32 pm
- Country: USA
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: 69 T350 thru 75 GT750
- Location: southwestern Pennsylvania
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
Here in the US, a mil is either 0.001 inches (0.0254 mm) or a mother-in-law.joolstacho wrote:5-8mm removed? Mils? Well I'd say you're going to need one mother of a cylinder packer! (Perhaps you mean 'thous')
?
BAS (Bike Acquisition Syndrome) - too many bikes but have room for more
Suzuki:
GT750 2x75
GT550 72 & 75
GT380 72
T500 69 project & 73 project
T350 69 & 71
Honda 85 CB650SC & 86 CB700SC
09 Triumph Bonneville SE
Suzuki:
GT750 2x75
GT550 72 & 75
GT380 72
T500 69 project & 73 project
T350 69 & 71
Honda 85 CB650SC & 86 CB700SC
09 Triumph Bonneville SE
- joolstacho
- To the on ramp
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 7:55 pm
- Country: Australia
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: AS50, GS500, GT500, ex GSXR750 slabbie
- Location: Greendale Vic, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
Oh well that's why you never made it to the moon!
- tz375
- Moto GP
- Posts: 6204
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:47 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
Do NOT use 2 gaskets on the head. That is pretty much guaranteed to leak.
First question is how much metal was actually removed from the head. Those motors are really low compression stock - even early ones with low exhaust ports, so up to 20 thou or .5mm is fine. No changes needed and no gasket goo.
If they really took 3mm off, the the pistons would hit the head, so that ain't goin' to fly without a 3mm spacer under the cylinder which will make more power.
So that takes us back to how much did they take off?
First question is how much metal was actually removed from the head. Those motors are really low compression stock - even early ones with low exhaust ports, so up to 20 thou or .5mm is fine. No changes needed and no gasket goo.
If they really took 3mm off, the the pistons would hit the head, so that ain't goin' to fly without a 3mm spacer under the cylinder which will make more power.
So that takes us back to how much did they take off?
- Olafskii
- On the street
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:15 pm
- Country: Canada
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: 72 GT750, 74 GT750, 75 T500, 76T500, 09 DR650
- Location: Northern British Columbia
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
Thanks for the replies.
In the English speaking parts of Canada the machining terminology is the same as in USA. The 5-8 mils (maybe a little less) that my local engine shop removed is 5-8 'thou' or .005"-.008" . In metric terms that's .13-.20mm or 130-200 microns. Visually, it's impossible to tell a difference between the 'height' of the skimmed head and a spare that I've got from a parts bike. (One interesting observation is that the casting quality on the parts engine (which is a '74) is considerably better than it is on the '72). My take-away is that engine runnability probably won't be affected by by the small amount of material that was removed from the head.
What are fellows' recommendations around using a jointing compound like Wellseal?
Olaf
In the English speaking parts of Canada the machining terminology is the same as in USA. The 5-8 mils (maybe a little less) that my local engine shop removed is 5-8 'thou' or .005"-.008" . In metric terms that's .13-.20mm or 130-200 microns. Visually, it's impossible to tell a difference between the 'height' of the skimmed head and a spare that I've got from a parts bike. (One interesting observation is that the casting quality on the parts engine (which is a '74) is considerably better than it is on the '72). My take-away is that engine runnability probably won't be affected by by the small amount of material that was removed from the head.
What are fellows' recommendations around using a jointing compound like Wellseal?
Olaf
- joolstacho
- To the on ramp
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 7:55 pm
- Country: Australia
- Suzuki 2-Strokes: AS50, GS500, GT500, ex GSXR750 slabbie
- Location: Greendale Vic, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Head gasket practice with a skimmed head and gasket seal
In over 50 years dealing with this stuff in the UK, Europe and America, I've rarely heard of the term Mils used in engineering parlance.
Thous as in thousandths of an inch yes, and decimals of millimeters yes.
Mils is commonly used in Fluid measurement, millilitres, e.g. 5mils is 5 millilitres.
The term MILS is too easily confused with mm or Millilitres IMHO.
My old American lathe displays nothing about 'Mils' Thous yes, because it's calibrated in inches and thousandths of inches.
?
Thous as in thousandths of an inch yes, and decimals of millimeters yes.
Mils is commonly used in Fluid measurement, millilitres, e.g. 5mils is 5 millilitres.
The term MILS is too easily confused with mm or Millilitres IMHO.
My old American lathe displays nothing about 'Mils' Thous yes, because it's calibrated in inches and thousandths of inches.
?