Hi Guys,
I believe we are thinking along the same lines Ref. the transition to a closed throttle with the engine still spinning at high revs. However you view it the engine suddenly has a loss of mixture (containing all that precious lubrication).
Dyno operators - They have me a bit tied up I must admit

. I have spoken to one who went into "3D mapping" and altering stuff to get the best power. I'm thinking "unless you intend to get the porting equipment out and re-design and weld up new pipes we aren't going far mate" . With the porting/pipes as they stand all that can be done is ignition point and jetting. Another chap spoke of being able to get a rough idea of where the jetting was by analysing the exhaust gas as the engine was revved up under no load, how the heck that checks out confuses the heck out of me as by the time you get to full throttle the pistons and rods would be on the outside

.
I have initially set the timing at 2.9mm BTDC, Mr Les Trotter (the alleged original engine builder) spoke to me of arriving at 3.1 - 3.2 mm BTDC after running it at a conservative setting to begin with. I then have supplementary advice from two others that if the dyno man does not monitor the running temperature he doesn't properly understand 2-st dyno-ing. The Powerdynamo advance curve is below, as you can see it is fairly simple. Taking the 0 degree line as your static setting (2.9mm BTDC) it has an advance that reduces to 0 again at 10,000 rpm (the absolute limit for a T500).
As you can see there is not a lot to play with (what the heck is a 3D map anyway). I believe that Powerdynamo can change this curve but it is factory job, no plugging in a Laptop here. If I can arrange it I will visit Tim Blakemore racing on Wednesday for a simple dyno run. (
http://www.timblakemoreracing.co.uk/bri ... ntact.html.
Cheers Geoff