I have new Suzuki pistons and rings. The rings came together and undisturbed, had to work a little to separate.
The issue I wonder if others have had is a few of the rings are too wide to fit in the groove. The rings stay stuck unable to compress in. I thought it was the pistons at first but the rings that work do so in all of the pistons, the others do not.
Last edited by TLRam1 on Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Terry
Maybe poker's not your game, Ike. I know! Let's have a spelling contest~
I hope you realize that Suzuki used "Keystone" rings. On some pistons, only one of the rings is a keystone. The keystones are not square, but are triangular-shaped, and if put in a square piston groove, they will stick.
Lane
If you stroke it more than twice; you're playing with it.
Too many bikes, too much time, ENOUGH SPACE, FINALLY! Never enough money.........
rngdng wrote:I hope you realize that Suzuki used "Keystone" rings. On some pistons, only one of the rings is a keystone. The keystones are not square, but are triangular-shaped, and if put in a square piston groove, they will stick.
I'm betting thats your problem. Both rings on the 550 are keystone type and only the top ring on the 380.
When I rebuilt my 550 last year, NONE of the rings were lettered or marked in any way. I had to use high magnification and a true straight edge to determine the beveled side. A jewelers loupe works good.
Terry,
I'm sorry about the mix-up with your rings. I didn't know that the 380 took two differnt rings per piston, why would anyone expect that who hadn't been inside one to find out or been Suzuki schooled.
My part software doesn't make the distinction either.
Since I sold them to you and, although I don't know what I could have done better for you to avoid this problem with the knowledge and tools I have, if you want me to make it up to you let me know what you would like.
Tim, what pulls up for the ring number with a zero at the end as the zero was changed with a pen? I sent Craig380 a PM to see if he can shed some light on this.
I don't know who else to PM for info.
Terry
Maybe poker's not your game, Ike. I know! Let's have a spelling contest~
I've re-ringed my '76 380 twice -- in 1999 when replacing a failing rod end bearing, and again in 2007 when I rebuilt the top end with a good used set of pistons and cylinders.
Both times, I had no problems with ANY of the rings sticking in the piston grooves. All rings & pistons were genuine Suzuki. And ALL the rings I got were of the keystone type, with a tiny letter indicating the top surface of the ring.
Now, the caveat here is, I was fitting new rings to used pistons. Maybe the ring grooves in the pistons were a little worn ... I don't know.
I was super-paranoid about putting the rings in the wrong way up, and ALL rings had angled top faces, I checked this.
Now, I must admit I always thought both top & bottom rings on each piston were of the keystone type.
All I can tell you is the bike has run great with (apparently) mixed rings for 10,000+ miles.
One thing is did notice -- the ring 'cutouts' that fit the locating pin in your photos look a LOT shallower than the cutouts on the rings I have. I will have to check when I get home.
1976 GT380 - wounded by me, and sold on
2006 SV650S - killed by a patch of diesel and a kerb in Feb 2019
2017 SV650 AL7 - naked and unashamed
Only thing that could be, -33700 shows '72 only, -33701 is '73 to '77 superceeded number for all years.
Unless there is something peculiar about -33700 that doesn't interchange with '73 to '77, and the person at the shop I bought the inventory from was incorrect when they changed the part number on the box assuming 2 way interchageability.
But does anyone have a set of -33701 to compare?
Tell me....
Do the rings work in some pistons and not others?
Do they work in all pistons, but in only the top groove or bottom groove?
Or do you get two of the rings I sold you in one piston, and none fit in the next?
Does the ring fit in the top groove in one piston, and in the bottom groove of the next?